Archive for November 10th, 2017

The joys of decluttering

Friday, November 10th, 2017

One of the side effects of practising mindfulness is those little insights into what creates a sense of unease and unbalance. For me cluttered spaces tend to feel oppressive and tiring. There is a certain peace in open spaces, free of "stuff" but sadly those are harder to achieve than it seems.

I hope you find yourself a little peaceful space this coming weekend.

For +FloralFriday curated by +Eustace James +Beth Akerman +Kiki Nelson and +Tamara Pruessner

#floralfriday #floralphotography #flowers #flowerphotography #hqspflowers

The joys of decluttering

One of the side effects of practising mindfulness is those little insights into what creates a sense of unease and unbalance. For me cluttered spaces tend to feel oppressive and tiring. There is a certain peace in open spaces, free of “stuff” but sadly those are harder to achieve than it seems.

I hope you find yourself a little peaceful space this coming weekend.

For +FloralFriday curated by +Eustace James +Beth

Google+: Reshared 6 times
Google+: View post on Google+

Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.

Let's talk about that Lord of the Rings TV Series rumour (Part 1)

Friday, November 10th, 2017

Let's talk about that Lord of the Rings TV Series rumour (Part 1)

So last week the story broke that Warner Brothers and the Tolkien Estate (it's unclear who the initiative came from) were in talks with various Streaming Content providers to potentially adapt The Lord of the Rings for television. I'm no fan of Game of Thrones but there's no denying that since HBO has adapted (and expanded) the Georges RR Martin books, it has become a global phenomenon gathering a rather large fan base.

When the Lord of Rings trilogy came out in 2001, 2002 and 2003 it was a huge success, even winning several academy awards for the Return of the King. Since then, the Hobbit was also adapted for cinema with far less enthusiasm. To put it bluntly, while the Lord of Rings adaptation had to cut parts of the book, The Hobbit added far too much unnecessary plot lines that never were in the original format.

Following on the success of the Lord of the Rings, I often thought it would make sense to take the story further and redo an adaptation for television where the story could be properly adapted in its entirety (including Tom Bombadill) and possibly even add extra story aspects which weren't in the book (much as they did for the Aragorn / Arwen story) but could be pulled from the appendixes and other sources if the Tolkien Estate allowed it.

Today I want to start what I hope to be multiple threads on this topic to open discussions on aspects of the production, casting and maybe distribution and what such a series might look like. Right now the front runner to adapt the books looks to be Amazon with the full weight of Jeff Bezos behind it, but if the article is correct there's a hefty price tag attached to it, so it may well prove to be too expensive, even for Amazon. However, let's assume that it will go ahead and start discussing the cast.

In the early days of the movie trilogy being announced there were all sorts of speculations about who would play which part (anyone recall Sean Connery as Gandalf?), some roles were even recast after production started (Aragorn was originally going to be played by Ethan Hawke). Ultimately, while the casting ended up being terrific, it wasn't perfect either and some roles will be very hard to be recast, most notably Gandalf and Saruman.

So beginning with beginnings, let's have a discussion about hobbits and who could play them. I wasn't too fond of Hobbits being normal-sized humans just shrunk to appear no more than 3ft. Hobbits should be stocky, with furry feet and no pointy ears. Perhaps hiring actors who are naturally short (like Peter Dinklage or Warwick Davis) would make more sense in a TV setting and possibly save quite a bit in practical effects to get the proportions correct. As such it may be difficult to throw names out of the hat on who should play Bilbo, Frodo, Sam, Merry and Pippin. One thing that would definitely make sense from a financial perspective is to hire relatively unknown actors. After all, how many GoT actors had you heard of before they were in the show (not counting Sean Bean), many of whom went on to have further successful TV and cinema careers?

I would also quite like to see the timeline properly respected, which potentially means having 2 actors play Frodo and Sam between the events of Bilbo's birthday party and the ring leaving the Shire (which are 19 years apart). Either that or doing proper make up, either way Frodo should not look like some 20-something shrunk human with pointy ears the way Elijah Wood did.

Previous actors guest-starring for smaller roles would be cool though, for instance I'd quite like to see Sean Astin come back to play the Gaffer if they don't go with all hobbits cast as little people.

Are you excited about the prospect of a potential Lord of the Rings TV show or do you hail the movies at the pinnacle of perfection? Let me know how you would recast the hobbits if you have any preferences.

Embedded Link

‘Lord Of The Rings’ TV Series Shopped With Huge Rights Payment Attached
UPDATED: In a deal that is expected to dwarf any TV series to date, I hear the J.R.R. Tolkien estate has been shopping a possible series based on the late author’s The Lord of the Rings novel…

Google+: View post on Google+

Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.